James Smith Calculator Reviews


James Smith is a renowned online fitness coach and personal trainer who has created various calculators to help people achieve their fitness goals. In this article, we will review some of the James Smith calculators and what people have to say about them.

  1. Calorie Calculator

The James Smith calorie calculator is designed to help people determine how many calories they need to consume each day to achieve their fitness goals. Many users find this calculator to be accurate and helpful in creating a meal plan that fits their daily caloric needs. Some users even noted that they were able to lose weight by following the recommended caloric intake. Check Personal Trainer James Smith.

  1. Macro Calculator

The James Smith macro calculator helps people determine how much protein, carbohydrates, and fat they should consume each day based on their fitness goals. Many users found this calculator to be helpful in creating a balanced meal plan and ensuring they are meeting their daily macro goals. Some users even noted an improvement in their overall health and fitness after using this calculator. You can also listen not a diet book audiobook online.

  1. TDEE Calculator

The Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE) calculator helps people determine how many calories they need to consume each day to maintain their current weight based on their activity level. Many users found this calculator to be helpful in creating a meal plan that fits their daily caloric needs and ensures they maintain their weight. Some users even noted an improvement in their overall energy levels after using this calculator. Is James Smith Academy Worth It?

  1. One-Rep Max Calculator

The one-rep max calculator helps people determine the maximum weight they can lift for one repetition. Many users found this calculator to be accurate and helpful in creating a strength training plan that fits their fitness level. Some users even noted an improvement in their overall strength after using this calculator.

Overall, the James Smith calculator have received positive reviews from many users. People find these calculators to be accurate, helpful, and easy to use. However, it’s important to remember that calculators are only tools, and it’s essential to consult with a healthcare professional or certified personal trainer before making any significant changes to your diet or exercise routine.

Metabolisms and Body Types

Metabolism is the chemical processes that occur within a living organism in order to maintain life. I know that’s not the sexiest definition for metabolism, but it’s important to note that people do differ huge amounts naturally, not only in the amount of calories they burn a day, but in the speed with which they lose and gain fat. So although the mechanisms and principles (calorie deficit), remain the same, chances are that people will always differ individually with how fast they occur.

Unless your scooter is called ‘metabolism’, you don’t need to kickstart anything. I came across a study a few years ago, involving prison inmates who were told that if they gained a certain amount of fat within a certain period of time, they’d be released early from prison. As you can imagine, the inmates stuffed their faces with as much as physically possible, whenever possible, yet the differences in weight gain hugely varied from person to person.

Even with identical twins there are differences in fat and weight gain when following the same hypercaloric* diet. So now let’s look at the mesomorph. People are quick to point the finger to superior genetics and the elusive and much sought-after ‘fast metabolism’; however, as coaches we must look past feeding our confirmation bias on how that person has obtained their physique.

It’s again important to note habits that can be a much larger contributor to the ‘body type’, rather than jumping to conclusions about how quick they turn over or metabolize nutrients. I have noted that former clients, friends and even relatives that would fit the ‘meso’ somatotype usually eat more slowly than other people at the table.

I watch how fast people eat (it’s quite easy because I’m usually done first as a very fast eater myself). I could tell you the speed all my friends eat at, actually. Ben Carpenter, who is another UK-based PT and a good friend of mine, first brought this to my attention in a post where he presented data on how increasing the number of times you chew your food can decrease food intake. (Ben, I’d say, is best known for breaking down scientific literature for everyday fitness enthusiasts to understand easily.)

In one study, chewing each mouthful forty times decreased intake by 11.9 per cent versus chewing fifteen times in both lean and obese subjects. However, we should also take into consideration that it may not be the chewing itself but the type of meal taking longer to eat in some cases. Foods requiring less time to eat may encourage greater consumption, for instance softer meals that require less chewing.

I know that 11.9 per cent doesn’t exactly make you want to count to forty between mouthfuls in your next meal. But considering a sensible calorie deficit is usually a reduction of 15–25 per cent of someone’s TDEE as a ball-park figure, it could make a substantial difference for someone who may not want to track what they eat or calorie count. Perhaps to be considered a tool for the tool belt when needed.

I know these things seem trivial, and they’re by no means gospel, but think about what we’ve covered so far in this book: more sleep, tracking your NEAT, potentially being more mindful when eating or even eating slower, let alone not being so misinformed by zealots with their own agenda. So many tools on your belt to use for a better life. And we haven’t even started on the nitty gritty of what you have considered ‘dieting’.

At the end of the scale, we have the ‘endomorph’, which sounds like a form of Power Ranger, to be honest. The attributes of the ‘endo’ somatotype would suggest that this person gains muscle easily, but also gains fat easily. The majority of humans in general are predisposed to gain fat fairly easily. I’d say that from an evolutionary standpoint alone it wouldn’t make sense for us not to. I think it’s important to note too that statistically, there are more people who gain weight easily than remain lean all year round without effort.

And although it’s unlikely, if we were to head into a famine in the next few months, the lean (and lucky bastards, metabolically speaking) would die first of starvation. Life is too short to spend it continually trying to be the leanest you can physically be. There’s a sweet spot, also known as balance; and I wonder about people who are obsessed about having a six-pack all year round when you think about how many hours of the day it is visible.

Is there a significant enough return on investment to have such a low body-fat percentage? Imagine someone who has assigned themselves as an ‘endomorph’ walks into the consultation. I don’t think to myself, Ah, classic endo, and reach for my ‘endomorph training programme’. Instead, it’s quite clear – depending on how much body fat that person has – that they are consuming too many calories for the amount they move on a daily basis.

Either that or they’re converting sunlight into calories in some form of photosynthesis, which is just not possible. The important thing here to realize and note is that it’s not often that ectomorph or mesomorph body types are targeted for propaganda in dieting and fitness. The overweight and the obese are typically the most desperate for a quick fix, and some clever marketing message comes up saying: ‘Are you eating right for your body type?’

This is a loaded question and it straight away gives the person in question the thought that they are not eating right for their body type. That must be it, they think. Ah-ha! It’s not the fact that I consume too many calories; it must be my body type and the fact I’m not eating right for it.

Consequently, energy balance – the key founding principle of fat loss – is not only overlooked, it’s completely disregarded. There are training considerations for people of different physiological compositions. For instance, I find my taller clients (lanky bastards) are much more comfortable doing sumo deadlifts over the traditional set-up because their femurs (thigh bones) are so bloody long.

However, on the diet side of things, not only is your body type largely bollocks, the nutritional interventions that are sold or claim to be of benefit are just marketing gimmicks. Trust me. The main thing they’re looking to get from you is an email address – it’s classic marketing 101. People will do or say whatever they can to keep the cost of acquiring that email address as low as possible.

James Smith-Personal Fitness Trainer

James Smith

James Smith is a well-known personal trainer and fitness coach based in the UK. He has gained a large following on social media, particularly on Instagram and YouTube, for his straightforward approach to health and fitness, often challenging mainstream ideas and advocating for evidence-based practices.

James is known for his no-nonsense approach to training and nutrition, emphasizing the importance of consistency and adherence to a sustainable lifestyle rather than quick-fix solutions. He has written several books on fitness and nutrition, including “Not a Diet Book” and “The Grind Bible”, which have become popular among his followers.

In addition to his online presence, James runs a coaching and training business, where he works with clients to help them achieve their fitness goals through customized workout and nutrition plans. He is also a frequent speaker at fitness conferences and events, where he shares his expertise and insights on the latest trends and practices in the industry.

Leave a Comment